Opportunity Overview
ATM: RFI-15434 — Biometric Verification Capability
Agency: Australian Taxation Office (ATO)
Type: Request for Information (non-binding)
Closes: 4-Jun-2026 14:00 ACT (4 calendar days from 2026-05-31)
Contact: Alison Buchanan — RFI15434@ato.gov.au
Why the ATO is asking
The ATO operates myid, Australia’s national Digital ID provider under the Digital ID Act 2024 (commenced 1-Dec-2024). myID has 14 M+ users, 6 M+ at IP3 (Strong) identity proofing, used 95 M+ times in the last 12 months across 240+ government online services.
myID’s current liveness-detection stack was procured in 2021. Since then biometric tech has moved on (anti-spoofing, deepfake defence, NFC-document binding). The ATO is now scoping a refresh and an expansion into offshore identity verification via NFC ePassports — neither covered by the existing stack.
What the ATO is asking for
- Liveness detection & facial image capture — detect spoofing, deepfakes, presentation attacks; capture biometric images of adequate quality for matching.
- Biometric matching — authentication during service access and account recovery without manual re-proofing.
- Technical verification of credentials — NFC-enabled verification of electronically readable identity documents (ePassports) for offshore users.
Solution must be SaaS, AWS-hosted, MAUI-compatible, Australian-data-resident, ISM-PROTECTED-certifiable, WCAG 2.1 AA, with 99.95 % availability and ≥10 000 verifications/hour @ p95 ≤ 1000 ms. See evaluation-criteria.
Where this could go
“As a direct result of this RFI, the ATO may proceed with a second stage that includes any of the following … Shortlist, RFT, RFQ, Limited Tender, Proof of Concept, Product demonstration/trial, or RFI closure.”
So this is market intelligence, with a strong shortlisting bias — RFI respondents who answer technically and demonstrate fit are the natural pool for the next stage.
Why SABLE is a strong fit
See sable-fit for the requirement-by-requirement mapping. The four distinctive pillars:
- Privacy by construction — biometric data never leaves the device; cryptographic guarantee via Halo2 ZK rather than a policy promise. Exceeds APP minimum and structurally fits the Digital ID Act 2024’s data-minimisation provisions.
- Selective disclosure via BBS+ — Verifiable Credential predicates (“over 18”, “Australian citizen”) provable without exposing underlying fields.
- Offline P2P operation — the capture / liveness / proof pipeline runs entirely on-device, no internet dependency for capture; addresses inclusivity for low-connectivity / offshore users.
- Open-source public good — Apache 2.0; any maturation work the ATO funds becomes freely available to any other government adopter. Candidate future deployment contexts include Anuna’s existing BARMM (Philippines) eGov engagement (natural extension; SABLE not yet deployed there), European public-sector identity stakeholders (early dialogue with Germany’s BSI), other Pacific / SEA governments, and adjacent use cases (age verification, healthcare, building access).
To our knowledge SABLE is the first open-source library to combine all four properties together with transparent ZK setup (no trusted ceremony) and no special hardware requirement.
Additional credibility signals:
- Spatial-flash liveness (Tang et al., NDSS 2018) — strong defence against photo / screen replay attacks without depth sensors
- Anuna track record — currently delivering eGov services (digital identity + citizen services + advisory) for BARMM (Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao) — production go-live July 2026 — same practitioner team that would deliver any ATO engagement (BARMM does not currently deploy SABLE). Adjacent: GovUK, CSIRO Data61, Microsoft, Autodesk, Suncorp, IAG, Telus, Telefónica. Early international dialogue on the SABLE approach with Germany’s BSI.
Open gaps that the response must acknowledge: third-party ISO/IEC 30107-3 EAL-2 (Level B) PAD test report, ASD PROTECTED certification, NV1-cleared Australian support staff. All addressable through a follow-on procurement stage. See gaps-and-risks.
Linked notes
- evaluation-criteria — every M / D / O requirement and our compliance position
- sable-fit — capability-by-capability mapping
- gaps-and-risks — honest gap analysis
- response-structure — what we have to submit
- key-dates — close date and lodgement
- ato-myid-context — what myID does today and where it’s heading